Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor v Masri

Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL & Anor v Masri

The court ordered an 80%/20% split of costs in favour of Mr Masri, summarily assessed the costs, allowed inclusion of late written submissions, and ordered immediate release of £63,533 from the security paid into court, with the balance retained pending further proceedings.

Parties
Debtor/appellant/applicant: Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL; Debtor/appellant/applicant: Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL; Creditor/respondent: Munib Masri
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Consequential Costs Determination
Outcome
Costs apportioned 80%/20% in favour of respondent; summary assessment; partial release of security for costs.
Legal Topics
Costs, Appeals, Security for Costs

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Consolidated Contractors International Company SAL

Debtor/appellant/applicant

Consolidated Contractors (Oil and Gas) Company SAL

Debtor/appellant/applicant

Munib Masri

Creditor/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Post Judgment Consequential Costs Determination

  1. 1 allocation of costs following partial success on appeal
  2. 2 assessment of costs
  3. 3 release of security for costs

Ratio Decidendi

The court ordered an 80%/20% split of costs in favour of Mr Masri, summarily assessed the costs, allowed inclusion of late written submissions, and ordered immediate release of £63,533 from the security paid into court, with the balance retained pending further proceedings.

Court Disposition

Costs apportioned 80%/20% in favour of respondent; summary assessment; partial release of security for costs.

Orders

  • Respondent awarded 80% of adjusted appeal costs (£18,533) and 20% as costs in application to exclude evidence or contempt application.
  • Costs of hearing before Steel J remain as previously ordered (£45,000 on account pending detailed assessment).