Joanne Laura Brierley v Christopher Howe & Anor
The first respondent was the successful party on the strike out application and is entitled to costs, summarily assessed at £30,000 plus VAT, payable within 21 days, subject to a rider permitting the petitioner to apply for deferral if evidence is filed promptly.
- Parties
- Petitioner: Joanne Laura Brierley; First Respondent: Christopher Howe; Second Respondent: 36 Bourne Street Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Company Petition (section 994 Companies Act 2006) / Post Strike Out Application; Costs Determination
- Outcome
- costs order against petitioner; summary assessment; payment deadline with rider for possible deferral application
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Strike Out Applications, Summary Assessment, Unfair Prejudice Petitions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Joanne Laura Brierley
Petitioner
Christopher Howe
First Respondent
36 Bourne Street Limited
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Company Petition (section 994 Companies Act 2006) / Post Strike Out Application; Costs Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Who should bear the costs of the strike out application?
- 2 Should costs be summarily assessed or subject to detailed assessment?
- 3 Should payment of costs be deferred or subject to a deadline?
Ratio Decidendi
The first respondent was the successful party on the strike out application and is entitled to costs, summarily assessed at £30,000 plus VAT, payable within 21 days, subject to a rider permitting the petitioner to apply for deferral if evidence is filed promptly.
Court Disposition
costs order against petitioner; summary assessment; payment deadline with rider for possible deferral application
Orders
- Petitioner to pay first respondent’s costs of and occasioned by the strike out application, summarily assessed at £30,000 plus VAT, within 21 days.
- Order subject to a rider: if petitioner files a fully evidenced application for stay or extension within a specified short timeframe, payment deadline is extended until determination of that application or further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment