The Secretary of State for Transport v Elliott Cuciurean
The ordinary principles of CPR Part 44 apply to costs in contempt proceedings, including protest cases. There is no special costs protection for contemnors with criminal legal aid. The proportionality of costs orders, in the context of Articles 10 and 11 ECHR, is generally satisfied where the injunction stage has already balanced competing rights and the contemnor knowingly breached the order. The means of the contemnor are only relevant if evidence is provided. The judge's exercise of discretion in awarding partial costs was not flawed.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: The Secretary of State for Transport; Claimant/respondent: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited; Defendant/appellant: Elliott Cuciurean
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 May 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (costs Order Following Committal for Contempt)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Contempt Proceedings, Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly, Injunctions, Protest Law, Proportionality, Legal Aid, Enforcement of Court Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Secretary of State for Transport
Claimant/respondent
High Speed Two (HS2) Limited
Claimant/respondent
Elliott Cuciurean
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From High Court (costs Order Following Committal for Contempt)
Legal Issues
- 1 What approach should the court take to costs orders against contemnors in protest cases?
- 2 Does the proportionality principle under Articles 10 and 11 ECHR require special treatment of costs in contempt proceedings?
- 3 Is there a legislative lacuna regarding costs protection for contemnors with criminal legal aid?
Ratio Decidendi
The ordinary principles of CPR Part 44 apply to costs in contempt proceedings, including protest cases. There is no special costs protection for contemnors with criminal legal aid. The proportionality of costs orders, in the context of Articles 10 and 11 ECHR, is generally satisfied where the injunction stage has already balanced competing rights and the contemnor knowingly breached the order. The means of the contemnor are only relevant if evidence is provided. The judge's exercise of discretion in awarding partial costs was not flawed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The costs order of £25,000 against Mr Cuciurean stands.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment