Ghadami v Bloomfield & Ors

Ghadami v Bloomfield & Ors

The judge's decision on costs was a discretionary case management decision, made after hearing full argument and considering all relevant circumstances, including the conduct of both parties. There was no error or oversight justifying appellate intervention, and the proposed appeal had no real prospect of success.

Parties
Applicant/claimant: Mohammad Reza Ghadami; Respondents/defendants: Paul Bloomfield & Ors
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
14 July 2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Costs Orders, Case Management, Disclosure of Documents
Civil Procedure Costs Orders Case Management Disclosure of Documents

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohammad Reza Ghadami

Applicant/claimant

Paul Bloomfield & Ors

Respondents/defendants

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Application for Permission to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether permission to appeal should be granted against a costs order made by the High Court
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to disclosure of correspondence between the respondents' solicitors and the court

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision on costs was a discretionary case management decision, made after hearing full argument and considering all relevant circumstances, including the conduct of both parties. There was no error or oversight justifying appellate intervention, and the proposed appeal had no real prospect of success.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • Permission to appeal refused
  • Application for disclosure refused