RAYMOND CLEWER v HIGGS & SONS (A FIRM)
There is no compelling reason to require payment of the outstanding costs orders as a condition for pursuit of the appeal, as enforcement against substantial equity in the property is possible and no unusual practical difficulties are anticipated.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Raymond Clewer; Defendants/respondents: Higgs & Sons (A Firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Professional Negligence / Application for Condition on Permission to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for condition on appeal adjourned; costs order made against claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Costs Orders, Appeal Conditions, Enforcement of Judgments
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Raymond Clewer
Claimant/appellant
Higgs & Sons (A Firm)
Defendants/respondents
Procedural Posture
Professional Negligence / Application for Condition on Permission to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether payment of outstanding costs orders should be a condition for pursuing appeal
- 2 Whether there is a compelling reason under CPR 52.18 to impose such a condition
Ratio Decidendi
There is no compelling reason to require payment of the outstanding costs orders as a condition for pursuit of the appeal, as enforcement against substantial equity in the property is possible and no unusual practical difficulties are anticipated.
Court Disposition
Application for condition on appeal adjourned; costs order made against claimant.
Orders
- Application adjourned generally with liberty to restore.
- Claimant to make a witness statement within fourteen days confirming factual matters and providing details of property equity.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment