- v - (London : Section 60 (1)?) [2013] UKFTT RP_LON_00AG_OLR_2012_0037 (24 November 2013)

- v - (London : Section 60 (1)?) [2013] UKFTT RP_LON_00AG_OLR_2012_0037 (24 November 2013)

The tribunal held that in principle the landlord is not entitled to recover the costs of argument or negotiation in connection with the terms of the lease extension.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2013] UKFTT RP_LON_00AG_OLR_2012_0037
Parties
Landlord: Margin Finance Corporation Ltd; Tenant: London Borough of Camden
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Property Tribunal Application / Decision
Outcome
application for recovery of negotiation costs dismissed
Legal Topics
Costs Recovery, Negotiation Costs, Section 60(1) 1993 Act
Property Law Landlord and Tenant Costs Recovery Negotiation Costs Section 60(1) 1993 Act

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Margin Finance Corporation Ltd

Landlord

London Borough of Camden

Tenant

Procedural Posture

Property Tribunal Application / Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the landlord is entitled to recover costs of argument or negotiation in connection with the terms of the extension

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal held that in principle the landlord is not entitled to recover the costs of argument or negotiation in connection with the terms of the lease extension.

Court Disposition

application for recovery of negotiation costs dismissed

Orders

  • Landlord not entitled to recover costs of argument or negotiation in connection with the terms of the lease extension