Matlaszek & Anor v Bloom Camillin (A Firm)
The Court of Appeal possesses inherent jurisdiction to reopen appeals in exceptional circumstances, but the facts of this case do not satisfy the required threshold for reopening; finality in litigation prevails and no significant injustice or lack of alternative remedy was established.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Jerzy Jan Matlaszek; Claimant/respondent: Elenora Irena Matlaszek; Defendant/appellant: Bloom Camillin (A Firm)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 February 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Order Dismissing Appeal
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Court Jurisdiction, Finality of Litigation, Reopening Appeals, Solicitors' Duty of Care, Assessment of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jerzy Jan Matlaszek
Claimant/respondent
Elenora Irena Matlaszek
Claimant/respondent
Bloom Camillin (A Firm)
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Application to Set Aside Order Dismissing Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to set aside its order dismissing an appeal?
- 2 Should the court exercise its discretion to reopen the appeal in the circumstances presented?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court of Appeal possesses inherent jurisdiction to reopen appeals in exceptional circumstances, but the facts of this case do not satisfy the required threshold for reopening; finality in litigation prevails and no significant injustice or lack of alternative remedy was established.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- application to set aside order dismissing appeal is dismissed
- costs awarded against the applicants
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment