Coventry City Council v A & Ors
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that B's rib fractures and facial bruise were caused by inappropriate force applied by her father, C, on two occasions, and that the mother, A, lied to protect him. The injuries were not explained by Vitamin D deficiency or other medical causes. The parents' handling...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Coventry City Council; First Respondent / Mother: A; Second Respondent / Father: C; Third Respondent / Child: B (by her Children’s Guardian, Sian Harrison)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Care Proceedings (public Law) / Judgment After Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- Threshold criteria for care order met; findings of non-accidental injury made against the father; mother found to have lied to protect father; no finding of wilful failure to follow sleeping or feeding advice.
- Legal Topics
- Care Orders, Non Accidental Injury, Threshold Criteria, Parental Responsibility, Expert Evidence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coventry City Council
Applicant
A
First Respondent / Mother
C
Second Respondent / Father
B (by her Children’s Guardian, Sian Harrison)
Third Respondent / Child
Procedural Posture
Care Proceedings (public Law) / Judgment After Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether threshold criteria under s.31 Children Act 1989 are met for making a care order
- 2 Whether B's injuries (rib fractures, bruise) were non-accidental and caused by a parent
- 3 Whether parents failed to follow safe sleeping and feeding advice
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, on the balance of probabilities, that B's rib fractures and facial bruise were caused by inappropriate force applied by her father, C, on two occasions, and that the mother, A, lied to protect him. The injuries were not explained by Vitamin D deficiency or other medical causes. The parents' handling of B in certain instances fell below reasonable standards and placed her at risk of significant harm. The threshold criteria under s.31 Children Act 1989 were met for public law intervention. There was insufficient evidence that the parents wilfully failed to follow sleeping or feeding advice to a degree amounting to significant harm.
Court Disposition
Threshold criteria for care order met; findings of non-accidental injury made against the father; mother found to have lied to protect father; no finding of wilful failure to follow sleeping or feeding advice.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment