Coventry City Council v LC & Ors.

Coventry City Council v LC & Ors.

The shared care arrangement should continue as it best serves the child's welfare, given both parents' ability to meet basic care needs and the child's expressed wishes. Change would be detrimental to the child. Intensive support, including family therapy and parenting advice, is mandated to address parental...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Applicant: Coventry City Council; Respondent Mother: LC; Respondent Father: AC; Child (through Guardian): The Child (KM)
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 April 2022
Procedural Posture
Family / Final Judgment After Hearing
Outcome
Child arrangements order made reflecting current shared care; section 91(14) barring order imposed; no supervision order; child in need plan to be implemented.
Legal Topics
Child Arrangements Order, Parental Responsibility, Parenting Styles, Family Therapy, Section 91(14) Barring Order, Supervision Order, Child in Need Plan
Family Law Child Welfare Child Arrangements Order Parental Responsibility Parenting Styles Family Therapy Section 91(14) Barring Order Supervision Order +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Coventry City Council

Applicant

LC

Respondent Mother

AC

Respondent Father

The Child (KM)

Child (through Guardian)

Procedural Posture

Family / Final Judgment After Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether shared care arrangement should continue or child should reside predominantly with one parent
  2. 2 Impact of parental acrimony and communication on child's welfare
  3. 3 Need for authoritative parenting and boundaries

Ratio Decidendi

The shared care arrangement should continue as it best serves the child's welfare, given both parents' ability to meet basic care needs and the child's expressed wishes. Change would be detrimental to the child. Intensive support, including family therapy and parenting advice, is mandated to address parental deficiencies and acrimony. A section 91(14) barring order is imposed to limit further litigation and force parental cooperation.

Court Disposition

Child arrangements order made reflecting current shared care; section 91(14) barring order imposed; no supervision order; child in need plan to be implemented.

Orders

  • Child arrangements order: shared care to continue as per existing schedule.
  • Section 91(14) barring order: parents barred from applying for child arrangements order or variation without leave until child's tenth birthday.