Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F v CPT Empresas Maritimas SA
The agreement between the parties incorporated the BIMCO Wreckhire form, including the arbitration clause, as evidenced by the communications, conduct, and absence of objection to standard terms. CPT is entitled to a permanent anti-suit injunction restraining TF from pursuing proceedings in Chile.
- Parties
- Claimant: Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F; Defendant: CPT Empresas Maritimas S. A.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Jurisdiction Dispute / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Permanent anti-suit injunction granted; CPT entitled to restrain TF from pursuing Chilean proceedings.
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Agreement, Jurisdiction, Contract Formation, Standard Contract Terms, Salvage Operations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tryggingarfelagio Foroyar P/F
Claimant
CPT Empresas Maritimas S. A.
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Jurisdiction Dispute / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the contract between the parties incorporated the BIMCO Wreckhire arbitration clause
- 2 Whether the dispute should be resolved in Chilean courts or by arbitration in England
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement between the parties incorporated the BIMCO Wreckhire form, including the arbitration clause, as evidenced by the communications, conduct, and absence of objection to standard terms. CPT is entitled to a permanent anti-suit injunction restraining TF from pursuing proceedings in Chile.
Court Disposition
Permanent anti-suit injunction granted; CPT entitled to restrain TF from pursuing Chilean proceedings.
Orders
- Permanent anti-suit injunction issued against TF
- Jurisdiction confirmed for arbitration in England under BIMCO Wreckhire terms
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment