Moore, R. v

Moore, R. v

The application was dismissed because the inconsistencies in the prosecution evidence were properly considered by the jury, the judge's summing-up was fair, the directions regarding the no comment interview were appropriate, and the proposed fresh evidence did not meet the threshold for admission on appeal.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Craig Donald Moore
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
07 October 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application dismissed
Legal Topics
Appeal Against Conviction, Assessment of Evidence, Jury Directions, Fresh Evidence
Criminal Law Appeal Against Conviction Assessment of Evidence Jury Directions Fresh Evidence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Craig Donald Moore

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether inconsistencies in prosecution evidence warranted quashing the conviction
  2. 2 Whether the judge's summing-up was unfair to the applicant
  3. 3 Whether the applicant's no comment interview was properly handled

Ratio Decidendi

The application was dismissed because the inconsistencies in the prosecution evidence were properly considered by the jury, the judge's summing-up was fair, the directions regarding the no comment interview were appropriate, and the proposed fresh evidence did not meet the threshold for admission on appeal.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction dismissed