Howells, R v [1998] EWCA Crim 2515 (30 July 1998)

Howells, R v [1998] EWCA Crim 2515 (30 July 1998)

A custodial sentence is justified only where the offence's seriousness, considering all circumstances and offender factors, makes any lesser sentence inadequate; courts must individualize sentence length and consider alternatives, especially for first-time or borderline offenders.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] EWCA Crim 2515
Parties
Applicant: Craig Howells; Applicant: Nicholas Alexander Ashby; Appellant: Dariusz Glowacki; Appellant: Kevin Wayne Robson; Appellant: David Leslie Howard; Appellant: Martin Paul Jarvis; Appellant: Stuart James Marston; Applicant: Mohammed Shanoor
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 July 1998
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeals / Reserved Judgment on Sentence Appeals
Outcome
Mixed: Some appeals allowed with sentences reduced or substituted; some refused.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Custodial Sentences, Threshold for Custody, Appeals Against Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Custodial Sentences Threshold for Custody Appeals Against Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 14 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Craig Howells

Applicant

Nicholas Alexander Ashby

Applicant

Dariusz Glowacki

Appellant

Kevin Wayne Robson

Appellant

David Leslie Howard

Appellant

Martin Paul Jarvis

Appellant

Stuart James Marston

Appellant

Mohammed Shanoor

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeals / Reserved Judgment on Sentence Appeals

Legal Issues

  1. 1 When is an offence so serious that only a custodial sentence can be justified?
  2. 2 Appropriate length of custodial sentences for borderline cases
  3. 3 Consideration of mitigating and aggravating factors in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

A custodial sentence is justified only where the offence's seriousness, considering all circumstances and offender factors, makes any lesser sentence inadequate; courts must individualize sentence length and consider alternatives, especially for first-time or borderline offenders.

Court Disposition

Mixed: Some appeals allowed with sentences reduced or substituted; some refused.

Orders

  • Howells: Sentence reduced from 9 to 4 months' imprisonment.
  • Ashby: Leave to appeal refused; 4 months' imprisonment upheld.