Norris, R. v
The court held that the statutory test for dangerousness under the 2003 Act was not met in this case, as the risk of serious harm was not significant given the appellant's lack of previous convictions, the role of alcohol, and the specific circumstances. Therefore, a sentence of detention for public protection was manifestly excessive and a determinate sentence was appropriate.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Craig Norris
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 April 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Dangerousness Assessment, Attempted Robbery, Detention for Public Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Craig Norris
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant met the statutory test for dangerousness under section 225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether a sentence of detention for public protection was appropriate
- 3 Whether the starting point for sentencing was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the statutory test for dangerousness under the 2003 Act was not met in this case, as the risk of serious harm was not significant given the appellant's lack of previous convictions, the role of alcohol, and the specific circumstances. Therefore, a sentence of detention for public protection was manifestly excessive and a determinate sentence was appropriate.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of detention for public protection quashed
- Substituted with four years' detention in a young offenders institution
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment