Pizza Hut & Ors v Cranbrook & Anor
Defendant is liable for full damages claimed by claimants, including property damage, business interruption, and refurbishment costs, as claims are supported by evidence and no challenge or negligence is alleged regarding scope of works; interest awarded from date of first payment at judgment rate.
- Parties
- Claimant: Pizza Hut (UK) Limited; Claimant: Alliance & Leicester Plc; Claimant: British Land Universal Plc; Defendant: Cranbrook; Defendant: Mr Varnham
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 27 October 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Judgment on Quantum
- Outcome
- judgment for claimants
- Legal Topics
- Negligence, Damages Assessment, Business Interruption, Property Damage, Recoverability of Repair Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Pizza Hut (UK) Limited
Claimant
Alliance & Leicester Plc
Claimant
British Land Universal Plc
Claimant
Cranbrook
Defendant
Mr Varnham
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Judgment on Quantum
Legal Issues
- 1 liability for fire damage caused by subcontractor
- 2 assessment of damages for property and business interruption
- 3 recoverability of refurbishment and reinstatement costs
Ratio Decidendi
Defendant is liable for full damages claimed by claimants, including property damage, business interruption, and refurbishment costs, as claims are supported by evidence and no challenge or negligence is alleged regarding scope of works; interest awarded from date of first payment at judgment rate.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimants
Orders
- Judgment against Mr Varnham in favour of Pizza Hut for £1,809,860.70 including interest.
- Judgment against Mr Varnham in favour of Alliance & Leicester for £1,082,836.30 including interest.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment