Craner v Dorset County Council
The raised paving slab constituted a sufficient risk to health and safety under the Workplace Regulations, and the employer was liable for the claimant's injury. The trolley was not unsuitable equipment, but liability attached under the Workplace Regulations due to the state of the paving slab.
- Parties
- Appellant: Craner; Respondent: Dorset County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 December 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Workplace Safety, Employer's Liability, Work Equipment Suitability, Workplace Regulations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Craner
Appellant
Dorset County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From County Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the raised paving slab constituted an obstruction or unevenness under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
- 2 Whether the trolley provided was unsuitable work equipment under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
- 3 Whether the employer was liable for the claimant's injury under the relevant regulations
Ratio Decidendi
The raised paving slab constituted a sufficient risk to health and safety under the Workplace Regulations, and the employer was liable for the claimant's injury. The trolley was not unsuitable equipment, but liability attached under the Workplace Regulations due to the state of the paving slab.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Judgment for the claimant under the Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992
- No liability under the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment