Mazrae v Secretary Of State For Home Department

Mazrae v Secretary Of State For Home Department

The Immigration Appeal Tribunal was entitled to refuse to reopen the first ground of appeal regarding the adjudicator's credibility findings. The applicant failed to properly present his case at the appropriate procedural stages, and there was no arguable error of law by the Tribunal justifying permission to appeal.

Parties
Appellant/claimant: Mohamed Shihab Mazrae; Defendant/respondent: Secretary of State for the Home Department
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (immigration/asylum) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal
Outcome
application refused
Legal Topics
Credibility Assessment, Admission of New Evidence, Procedural Fairness, Mistake of Fact, Appeal Grounds
Immigration Law Asylum Law Credibility Assessment Admission of New Evidence Procedural Fairness Mistake of Fact Appeal Grounds

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mohamed Shihab Mazrae

Appellant/claimant

Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant/respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal (immigration/asylum) / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal to Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Immigration Appeal Tribunal erred in refusing to consider the first ground of appeal regarding the adjudicator's approach to credibility and expert evidence
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator failed to properly consider medical and expert evidence relevant to the applicant's credibility
  3. 3 Whether a mistake of fact or procedural unfairness occurred justifying intervention by the Court of Appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The Immigration Appeal Tribunal was entitled to refuse to reopen the first ground of appeal regarding the adjudicator's credibility findings. The applicant failed to properly present his case at the appropriate procedural stages, and there was no arguable error of law by the Tribunal justifying permission to appeal.

Court Disposition

application refused

Orders

  • renewed application for permission to appeal dismissed