Portman Insurance Plc, Re
Active trading is not a requirement under the SE Regulation for certification of pre-merger acts and formalities; certification should not be refused solely because Portman SA is dormant.
- Parties
- Claimant: Portman Insurance Plc; Subsidiary: Portman SA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Part 8 Claim for Certification Under Article 25(2) of Council Regulation (ec) No 2157/2001 / First Stage Scrutiny of Pre Merger Acts and Formalities
- Outcome
- certificate issued attesting to completion of pre-merger acts and formalities
- Legal Topics
- Cross Border Merger, Societas Europaea Formation, Pre Merger Certification, Dormant Company Participation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Portman Insurance Plc
Claimant
Portman SA
Subsidiary
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim for Certification Under Article 25(2) of Council Regulation (ec) No 2157/2001 / First Stage Scrutiny of Pre Merger Acts and Formalities
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether certification should be refused because Portman SA is a dormant, non-trading shell company
- 2 Whether the SE Regulation requires participating companies to be actively trading
Ratio Decidendi
Active trading is not a requirement under the SE Regulation for certification of pre-merger acts and formalities; certification should not be refused solely because Portman SA is dormant.
Court Disposition
certificate issued attesting to completion of pre-merger acts and formalities
Orders
- Certification granted under Article 25(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment