Portman Insurance Plc, Re

Portman Insurance Plc, Re

Active trading is not a requirement under the SE Regulation for certification of pre-merger acts and formalities; certification should not be refused solely because Portman SA is dormant.

Parties
Claimant: Portman Insurance Plc; Subsidiary: Portman SA
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 November 2016
Procedural Posture
Part 8 Claim for Certification Under Article 25(2) of Council Regulation (ec) No 2157/2001 / First Stage Scrutiny of Pre Merger Acts and Formalities
Outcome
certificate issued attesting to completion of pre-merger acts and formalities
Legal Topics
Cross Border Merger, Societas Europaea Formation, Pre Merger Certification, Dormant Company Participation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Portman Insurance Plc

Claimant

Portman SA

Subsidiary

Procedural Posture

Part 8 Claim for Certification Under Article 25(2) of Council Regulation (ec) No 2157/2001 / First Stage Scrutiny of Pre Merger Acts and Formalities

  1. 1 Whether certification should be refused because Portman SA is a dormant, non-trading shell company
  2. 2 Whether the SE Regulation requires participating companies to be actively trading

Ratio Decidendi

Active trading is not a requirement under the SE Regulation for certification of pre-merger acts and formalities; certification should not be refused solely because Portman SA is dormant.

Court Disposition

certificate issued attesting to completion of pre-merger acts and formalities

Orders

  • Certification granted under Article 25(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2157/2001