Crossley v Crossley
The appeal is dismissed because the judge's case management was within his discretion, proportionate to the facts, and did not preclude consideration of all section 25 factors. The prenuptial agreement is highly significant but not determinative, and the alternative disclosure mechanism was adequate.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: CROSSLEY; Respondent: CROSSLEY
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Case Management Order in Ancillary Relief Proceedings
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal granted due to importance of issues
- Legal Topics
- Prenuptial Agreements, Ancillary Relief, Case Management, Disclosure, Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 Section 25
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CROSSLEY
Appellant
CROSSLEY
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Law Appeal / Appeal From Case Management Order in Ancillary Relief Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge erred in case management by limiting disclosure and questionnaire prior to considering the impact of a prenuptial agreement
- 2 Whether the prenuptial agreement should be determinative or highly influential in the ancillary relief proceedings
- 3 Whether the Family Proceedings Rules were properly applied
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the judge's case management was within his discretion, proportionate to the facts, and did not preclude consideration of all section 25 factors. The prenuptial agreement is highly significant but not determinative, and the alternative disclosure mechanism was adequate.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; permission to appeal granted due to importance of issues
Orders
- Application for permission to appeal granted
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment