Balli, Re Contempt of Court Act 1981 (No. 2)

The contemnor's application to purge contempt is partially allowed: immediate release is refused, but the original sentence is commuted to allow for earlier deferred unconditional release, reflecting the contemnor's genuine remorse, apology, and the punitive nature of the original sentence.

Parties: Contemnor/applicant: Ravinder Balli (also known as Ravinder Singh); Respondent: Crown (Court)
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 15 July 2011
Procedural Posture: Contempt of Court (committal) / Application to Purge Contempt After Committal and Sentencing
Outcome: Application to purge contempt partially allowed; sentence commuted; deferred release ordered.
Legal Topics: Purging Contempt, Sentencing for Contempt, Release From Imprisonment, Judicial Discretion

Contempt of Court Criminal Procedure Purging Contempt Sentencing for Contempt Release From Imprisonment Judicial Discretion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

Ravinder Balli (also known as Ravinder Singh)

Contemnor/applicant

Crown (Court)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Contempt of Court (committal) / Application to Purge Contempt After Committal and Sentencing

Legal Issues

1 Whether the contemnor should be released immediately, have release deferred, or have the application to purge contempt refused
2 Whether the original sentence should be varied in light of the contemnor's application to purge

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

Application to purge contempt partially allowed; sentence commuted; deferred release ordered.

Orders

Immediate release refused.
Contemnor to be released unconditionally on 29 July 2011, earlier than the original release date of 30 September 2011.