Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis, R (on the application of) v Crown Court at Kingston-Upon-Thames
The Crown Court has jurisdiction to conduct a Closed Material Procedure in firearms licensing appeals under s.44 of the Firearms Act 1968 where necessary, as the statutory scheme and guidance require consideration of sensitive material, and Parliament's intention is that the court must have regard to all relevant information. The absence of express statutory provision does not preclude a CMP in these circumstances, and the preliminary ruling to the contrary was wrong in law.
- Parties
- Claimant: Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis; Defendant: Crown Court at Kingston-Upon-Thames; Interested Party: Trevor Scott
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Judgment After Full Hearing
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; preliminary ruling of the Crown Court quashed; matter remitted for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Closed Material Procedure, Firearms Licensing, Public Interest Immunity, Procedural Fairness, Statutory Interpretation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Commissioner of the Police of the Metropolis
Claimant
Crown Court at Kingston-Upon-Thames
Defendant
Trevor Scott
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Judgment After Full Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown Court has jurisdiction to conduct a Closed Material Procedure (CMP) in a firearms licensing appeal under s.44 of the Firearms Act 1968.
- 2 Whether the absence of express statutory provision precludes a CMP in such appeals.
- 3 Whether the statutory guidance and legislative scheme imply the availability of CMP.
Ratio Decidendi
The Crown Court has jurisdiction to conduct a Closed Material Procedure in firearms licensing appeals under s.44 of the Firearms Act 1968 where necessary, as the statutory scheme and guidance require consideration of sensitive material, and Parliament's intention is that the court must have regard to all relevant information. The absence of express statutory provision does not preclude a CMP in these circumstances, and the preliminary ruling to the contrary was wrong in law.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; preliminary ruling of the Crown Court quashed; matter remitted for rehearing.
Orders
- The preliminary ruling of the Crown Court is quashed.
- The appeal is remitted to the Crown Court for rehearing in accordance with the judgment and attached procedural guidance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment