O'Donoghue, Re
The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof required under section 83(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 by not accounting for the fate of the £35,500 realisable asset. The court found no violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and held that the judge was correct to refuse the certificate of inadequacy.
- Parties
- Applicant/defendant: Keith James O'Donoghue; Respondent: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Refusal of Certificate of Inadequacy
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Certificate of Inadequacy, Realisable Property, Burden of Proof, Confiscation Order, Hidden Assets
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Keith James O'Donoghue
Applicant/defendant
Crown Prosecution Service
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Refusal of Certificate of Inadequacy
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a certificate of inadequacy under section 83(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
- 2 Whether the burden of proof was discharged by the applicant regarding the fate of realisable assets, particularly £35,500
- 3 Whether the approach taken violates Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to discharge the burden of proof required under section 83(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 by not accounting for the fate of the £35,500 realisable asset. The court found no violation of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and held that the judge was correct to refuse the certificate of inadequacy.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed
- No certificate of inadequacy granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment