McMillan v Crown Prosecution Service

McMillan v Crown Prosecution Service

The police officer's act of taking the appellant by the arm and leading her from the garden to the public footpath was within generally acceptable standards of conduct and did not constitute assault; therefore, the conviction for being drunk and disorderly in a public place stands.

Parties
Claimant: Mary McMillan; Defendant: Crown Prosecution Service
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
12 May 2008
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Case Stated / High Court Appeal From Magistrates' Court Conviction
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Drunk and Disorderly, Assault by Police, Lawfulness of Police Conduct, Public Order Act, Evidence Exclusion

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary McMillan

Claimant

Crown Prosecution Service

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal by Case Stated / High Court Appeal From Magistrates' Court Conviction

  1. 1 Whether police officer's physical contact with appellant constituted assault
  2. 2 Whether appellant's disorderly behaviour in a public place was a result of unlawful police conduct
  3. 3 Whether evidence should have been excluded under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

Ratio Decidendi

The police officer's act of taking the appellant by the arm and leading her from the garden to the public footpath was within generally acceptable standards of conduct and did not constitute assault; therefore, the conviction for being drunk and disorderly in a public place stands.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Conviction upheld
  • Questions posed by magistrates answered in the affirmative except where rendered moot