Hamberger, R (On the Application Of) v Crown Prosecution Service
The claimant's grounds for judicial review are not arguable because the trial judge found him fit to plead after considering medical evidence, the statutory requirements for video link evidence are not met, and judicial review should not interrupt ongoing Crown Court proceedings except in exceptional circumstances, which are not present here.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hamberger; Defendant: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
- Outcome
- Permission to apply for judicial review refused
- Legal Topics
- Fitness to Plead, Video Link Evidence, Article 2 ECHR, Article 3 ECHR, Case Management in Criminal Trials
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamberger
Claimant
Crown Prosecution Service
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Renewed Application for Permission to Apply for Judicial Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the CPS decision to continue prosecution was unlawful due to claimant's health and ECHR rights
- 2 Whether the claimant could participate in trial via video link under statutory authority
- 3 Whether judicial review is appropriate where trial on indictment is ongoing
Ratio Decidendi
The claimant's grounds for judicial review are not arguable because the trial judge found him fit to plead after considering medical evidence, the statutory requirements for video link evidence are not met, and judicial review should not interrupt ongoing Crown Court proceedings except in exceptional circumstances, which are not present here.
Court Disposition
Permission to apply for judicial review refused
Orders
- Renewed application for permission to apply for judicial review is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment