Robbie the Pict, R (on the application of) v Crown Prosecution Service [2009] EWHC 1176 (Admin) (24 April 2009)
The statutory scheme under section 20 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 as amended requires that the description of a prescribed device be specified by statutory instrument, but the approval of the type of device may be given by the Secretary of State without a statutory instrument. The Gatsometer type 36 was lawfully approved and evidence from it was admissible.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1176 (Admin)
- Parties
- Claimant: Robbie the Pict; Defendant: Crown Prosecution Service
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court (administrative Court) Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Statutory Interpretation, Admissibility of Evidence, Road Traffic Offences, Approval of Devices, Separation of Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Robbie the Pict
Claimant
Crown Prosecution Service
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court (administrative Court) Judgment on Appeal From Magistrates' Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Gatsometer type 36 device was properly approved as a 'prescribed device' under section 20 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 as amended
- 2 Whether approval of the device required a statutory instrument laid before Parliament or could be by Secretary of State's published approval
Ratio Decidendi
The statutory scheme under section 20 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 as amended requires that the description of a prescribed device be specified by statutory instrument, but the approval of the type of device may be given by the Secretary of State without a statutory instrument. The Gatsometer type 36 was lawfully approved and evidence from it was admissible.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Order for costs in the sum of £100 against the claimant
- Permission to appeal to the House of Lords refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment