Crown Prosecution Service, R (on the application of) v Smith

Crown Prosecution Service, R (on the application of) v Smith

The magistrates erred in law by dismissing the proceedings without hearing evidence or representations from the prosecution, contrary to statutory duty and binding authority. Section 142(1) cannot be used to rectify this error after dismissal as it applies only to offenders, not acquitted persons.

Parties
Appellant: Crown Prosecution Service; Respondent: Alan Smith
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Non Molestation Order, Breach of Order, Magistrates' Court Procedure, Appeal by Way of Case Stated
Criminal Law Family Law Procedural Law Non Molestation Order Breach of Order Magistrates' Court Procedure Appeal by Way of Case Stated

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Crown Prosecution Service

Appellant

Alan Smith

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal by Way of Case Stated / Judgment on Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether magistrates erred in dismissing proceedings without hearing prosecution evidence or representations
  2. 2 Whether Section 142 of the Magistrates' Court Act 1980 allows rectification after dismissal in these circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The magistrates erred in law by dismissing the proceedings without hearing evidence or representations from the prosecution, contrary to statutory duty and binding authority. Section 142(1) cannot be used to rectify this error after dismissal as it applies only to offenders, not acquitted persons.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

  • Case remitted to the justices for a trial of the information
  • Second question answered in the negative