Crown Prosecution Service v C & Ors
There was no jurisdiction for the Crown's appeal because the prosecution failed to notify the court of its agreement under section 58(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 at or before the time of announcing its intention to appeal. Compliance with section 58(8) is a mandatory condition precedent to the right of appeal, and the subsequent acquittal of the defendants precluded any appeal. The requirements of section 58(4) and (8) are strict and must be fulfilled for jurisdiction to exist.
- Parties
- Appellant: Crown Prosecution Service; Respondent: C; Respondent: M; Respondent: H
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- Prosecution Appeals, Terminating Rulings, Adjournment, Acquittal, Case Management, Criminal Justice Act 2003 Section 58
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Crown Prosecution Service
Appellant
C
Respondent
M
Respondent
H
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Terminating Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown Prosecution Service had jurisdiction to appeal a terminating ruling after acquittal without compliance with section 58(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether the judge's refusal to grant an adjournment and subsequent acquittal precluded the right of appeal under section 58
- 3 Whether the requirements of section 58(4) and (8) are mandatory conditions precedent to the right of appeal
Ratio Decidendi
There was no jurisdiction for the Crown's appeal because the prosecution failed to notify the court of its agreement under section 58(8) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 at or before the time of announcing its intention to appeal. Compliance with section 58(8) is a mandatory condition precedent to the right of appeal, and the subsequent acquittal of the defendants precluded any appeal. The requirements of section 58(4) and (8) are strict and must be fulfilled for jurisdiction to exist.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment