Electronic Arts CV v CTO SpA [2003] EWHC 1020 (Comm) (06 May 2003)
The court held that the parties are bound by a valid arbitration agreement covering the disputes raised in the Italian proceedings. The claim for an anti-suit injunction falls within the arbitration exception in Article 1.2(d) of EC Regulation 44/2001, so the Regulation does not apply. There were no strong reasons—whether public policy, multiplicity of proceedings, or comity—to refuse the injunction. The claimant is entitled to enforce the arbitration agreement by restraining the defendant from pursuing the Italian proceedings against it.
- Citation
- [2003] EWHC 1020 (Comm)
- Parties
- Claimant: Electronic Arts CV; Defendant: CTO SpA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 06 May 2003
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Injunction / Interim Relief Hearing Before the High Court, Commercial Court
- Outcome
- Interim injunction granted
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Arbitration Agreements, Jurisdiction, Competition Law, Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Electronic Arts CV
Claimant
CTO SpA
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Injunction / Interim Relief Hearing Before the High Court, Commercial Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the English court should grant an interim anti-suit injunction restraining CTO from pursuing proceedings in Italy contrary to an arbitration agreement
- 2 Whether the claims in the Italian proceedings fall within the scope of the arbitration agreement
- 3 Whether the arbitration exception in Article 1.2(d) of EC Regulation 44/2001 applies to the present proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the parties are bound by a valid arbitration agreement covering the disputes raised in the Italian proceedings. The claim for an anti-suit injunction falls within the arbitration exception in Article 1.2(d) of EC Regulation 44/2001, so the Regulation does not apply. There were no strong reasons—whether public policy, multiplicity of proceedings, or comity—to refuse the injunction. The claimant is entitled to enforce the arbitration agreement by restraining the defendant from pursuing the Italian proceedings against it.
Court Disposition
Interim injunction granted
Orders
- CTO SpA is restrained from prosecuting the Italian proceedings against Electronic Arts CV or commencing any further proceedings relating to the interpretation or enforcement of the distribution agreement, pending further order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment