AMD Environmental Ltd v Cumberland Construction Company Ltd

AMD Environmental Ltd v Cumberland Construction Company Ltd

The dispute had crystallised due to extensive exchanges and disagreement; the adjudicator properly addressed all relevant matters and did not breach natural justice by requesting further information. The jurisdictional challenges were without merit, and the adjudicator's decision is enforceable.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Claimant: AMD Environmental Ltd; Defendant: Cumberland Construction Company Ltd
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 February 2016
Procedural Posture
Adjudication Enforcement / Summary Judgment Application
Outcome
Application to enforce adjudicator's decision granted.
Legal Topics
Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdictional Challenge, Natural Justice, Crystallisation of Dispute, Particularisation, Failure to Address Matters in Issue, Interest, Indemnity Costs
Construction Law Contract Law Adjudication Enforcement Jurisdictional Challenge Natural Justice Crystallisation of Dispute Particularisation Failure to Address Matters in Issue +2 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AMD Environmental Ltd

Claimant

Cumberland Construction Company Ltd

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Adjudication Enforcement / Summary Judgment Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether a dispute had crystallised at the time of the notice of adjudication
  2. 2 Whether the adjudicator failed to address matters in issue
  3. 3 Whether the adjudicator breached natural justice by requesting further information

Ratio Decidendi

The dispute had crystallised due to extensive exchanges and disagreement; the adjudicator properly addressed all relevant matters and did not breach natural justice by requesting further information. The jurisdictional challenges were without merit, and the adjudicator's decision is enforceable.

Court Disposition

Application to enforce adjudicator's decision granted.

Orders

  • Claimant awarded £109,408.55 including VAT and £1,679.72 interest.
  • Interest awarded at 6%.