Cush Decor Ltd v The Pensions Regulator
The Tribunal declined to admit the rule 4(3) application due to a severe and unexplained delay of 453 days, finding no justification and prioritising the public interest in compliance and finality.
- Parties
- Appellant: Cush Decor Ltd; Respondent: The Pensions Regulator
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Application to Admit Out of Time Review
- Outcome
- Application not admitted; Tribunal will take no further action.
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Tribunal Procedure, Penalty Notices
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cush Decor Ltd
Appellant
The Pensions Regulator
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Application to Admit Out of Time Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should admit a rule 4(3) application made 453 days out of time
- 2 Whether reasons provided justify extension of time for review
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal declined to admit the rule 4(3) application due to a severe and unexplained delay of 453 days, finding no justification and prioritising the public interest in compliance and finality.
Court Disposition
Application not admitted; Tribunal will take no further action.
Orders
- Rule 4(3) application not admitted
- No further action by Tribunal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment