Cusworth v British Gas Ltd.
There was no error of law in the tribunals' decisions. The compromise agreement and issue estoppel barred the claims except the equal pay claim, which was out of time under the Equal Pay Act 1970. The time limits were not incompatible with European Community Law. The costs order was within the tribunal's discretion as the claims were misconceived.
- Parties
- Appellant: Cusworth; Respondent: British Gas Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Execution
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Costs Order, Jurisdiction, Compromise Agreement, Limitation Period, Statutory Grievance Procedure, Issue Estoppel
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cusworth
Appellant
British Gas Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal and Stay of Execution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal erred in law in dismissing the appellant's claims for want of jurisdiction
- 2 Whether the costs order against the appellant was wrong in law
- 3 Whether the time limits under the Equal Pay Act 1970 are incompatible with European Community Law
Ratio Decidendi
There was no error of law in the tribunals' decisions. The compromise agreement and issue estoppel barred the claims except the equal pay claim, which was out of time under the Equal Pay Act 1970. The time limits were not incompatible with European Community Law. The costs order was within the tribunal's discretion as the claims were misconceived.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal refused
- Stay of execution refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment