C, R v [2001] EWCA Crim 57 (17 January 2001)
The sentence of detention was quashed because psychiatric evidence overwhelmingly supported disposal by hospital order, and the lack of pre-sentence report and opportunity to mitigate rendered the original sentencing process defective. An interim hospital order under section 38 of the Mental Health Act was the proper disposal.
- Citation
- [2001] EWCA Crim 57
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: D. C.
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence quashed; interim hospital order made under section 38 Mental Health Act
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Hospital Orders, Psychiatric Assessment, Children and Young Persons, Pre Sentence Reports
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
D. C.
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence of detention under section 53 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933 was appropriate given psychiatric evidence and lack of pre-sentence report
- 2 Whether an interim hospital order under section 38 of the Mental Health Act should be made
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of detention was quashed because psychiatric evidence overwhelmingly supported disposal by hospital order, and the lack of pre-sentence report and opportunity to mitigate rendered the original sentencing process defective. An interim hospital order under section 38 of the Mental Health Act was the proper disposal.
Court Disposition
sentence quashed; interim hospital order made under section 38 Mental Health Act
Orders
- Sentence of detention quashed
- Interim hospital order under section 38 Mental Health Act made
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment