D Ltd v A & Ors [2017] EWCA Crim 1172 (28 July 2017)

D Ltd v A & Ors [2017] EWCA Crim 1172 (28 July 2017)

The judge's decision to stay the prosecution was not justified; there was no evidential basis for findings of wilful suppression of evidence or irredeemable taint, and criticisms of conduct and disclosure did not render a fair trial impossible. The proper application of legal principles required the prosecution to proceed, as neither limb one nor limb two was satisfied.

Citation
[2017] EWCA Crim 1172
Parties
Applicant: D Limited; Respondent: A; Respondent: B; Respondent: C; Respondent: D; Respondent: E; Respondent: F
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
28 July 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Stay of Prosecution (abuse of Process)
Outcome
Appeal allowed; stay of prosecution set aside.
Legal Topics
Abuse of Process, Private Prosecution, Disclosure, Fair Trial, Case Management
Criminal Law Procedure Fraud Abuse of Process Private Prosecution Disclosure Fair Trial Case Management

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 8
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D Limited

Applicant

A

Respondent

B

Respondent

C

Respondent

D

Respondent

E

Respondent

F

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Stay of Prosecution (abuse of Process)

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the stay of prosecution for abuse of process was justified under limb one (fair trial impossible) or limb two (offends justice)
  2. 2 Whether prosecutorial conduct, motives, and disclosure failures rendered a fair trial impossible
  3. 3 Whether private prosecution standards were met

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's decision to stay the prosecution was not justified; there was no evidential basis for findings of wilful suppression of evidence or irredeemable taint, and criticisms of conduct and disclosure did not render a fair trial impossible. The proper application of legal principles required the prosecution to proceed, as neither limb one nor limb two was satisfied.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; stay of prosecution set aside.

Orders

  • Prosecution to proceed; case remitted for trial.
  • Reporting restrictions under s.71 Criminal Justice Act 2003 remain in force.