M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children As Parties To Appeal)

M (Republic of Ireland) (Child's Objections) (Joinder of Children As Parties To Appeal)

The trial judge erred in concluding the children did not object in the Article 13 sense. The evidence established genuine objections to return, and J and T had sufficient age and maturity for their views to be taken into account. At the discretion stage, the children’s strong fears, emotional vulnerability, and the inadequacy of protective measures to address their immediate psychological state outweighed the Hague Convention policy considerations. The appeals were allowed and the return order set aside.

Parties
Appellants: J, T, and I (children); Appellant: D (older sibling); Appellant: Mother; Respondent: Father
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
27 January 2015
Procedural Posture
Appeal (family Law Hague Convention) / Appeal From High Court Decision Ordering Return of Children Under Hague Convention
Outcome
Appeal allowed. Return order set aside.
Legal Topics
Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction, Child's Objections Exception, Joinder of Children as Parties, Discretion in Return Orders
Family Law International Law Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction Child's Objections Exception Joinder of Children as Parties Discretion in Return Orders

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 20 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J, T, and I (children)

Appellants

D (older sibling)

Appellant

Mother

Appellant

Father

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal (family Law Hague Convention) / Appeal From High Court Decision Ordering Return of Children Under Hague Convention

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in finding the children did not object to return under Article 13 of the Hague Convention
  2. 2 Proper approach to the child's objections exception under Article 13
  3. 3 Whether the children should be joined as parties to the appeal

Ratio Decidendi

The trial judge erred in concluding the children did not object in the Article 13 sense. The evidence established genuine objections to return, and J and T had sufficient age and maturity for their views to be taken into account. At the discretion stage, the children’s strong fears, emotional vulnerability, and the inadequacy of protective measures to address their immediate psychological state outweighed the Hague Convention policy considerations. The appeals were allowed and the return order set aside.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed. Return order set aside.

Orders

  • Father’s application for the return of the children to Ireland dismissed.
  • Children’s joinder as parties to the appeal confirmed.