D, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 104 (28 January 2025)
There was no evidence establishing a risk of future harassment or inappropriate behaviour by the appellant towards C2 since 2016; thus, it was not necessary to impose a restraining order to protect C2.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 104
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: D
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Restraining Order Following Acquittal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Restraining Orders, Acquittal, Sexual Offences, Protection From Harassment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
D
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Restraining Order Following Acquittal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it was necessary to impose a restraining order on C2 following the appellant's acquittal of sexual assault charges against her
Ratio Decidendi
There was no evidence establishing a risk of future harassment or inappropriate behaviour by the appellant towards C2 since 2016; thus, it was not necessary to impose a restraining order to protect C2.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- restraining order in relation to C2 set aside
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment