D v R
The court below failed to comply with its mandatory duty to consider and make participation directions for a vulnerable party under FPR Part 3A and Practice Direction 3AA in a case involving allegations of domestic abuse. This procedural failure resulted in an unfair hearing, requiring the findings to be set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration before a different judge.
- Parties
- Applicant: D; Respondent: R
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Family Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; findings set aside; matter remitted for rehearing before a different judge.
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Vulnerable Witnesses, Participation Directions, Fact Finding Hearings, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D
Applicant
R
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court below failed to comply with its duties under FPR Part 3A and Practice Direction 3AA regarding vulnerable witnesses in cases involving allegations of domestic abuse
- 2 Whether the failure to consider or make participation directions rendered the fact-finding hearing unfair
Ratio Decidendi
The court below failed to comply with its mandatory duty to consider and make participation directions for a vulnerable party under FPR Part 3A and Practice Direction 3AA in a case involving allegations of domestic abuse. This procedural failure resulted in an unfair hearing, requiring the findings to be set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration before a different judge.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; findings set aside; matter remitted for rehearing before a different judge.
Orders
- Findings of fact set aside
- Matter remitted to Designated Family Judge for directions within three weeks
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment