C (Minor), Re [2010] EWCC 11 (Fam) (2010)

C (Minor), Re [2010] EWCC 11 (Fam) (2010)

The evidence demonstrates the mother lacks the necessary skills and capacity to protect K and meet his needs; therefore, a care order and placement order are necessary in K's best interests, and the mother's consent is dispensed with.

Citation
[2010] EWCC 11 (Fam)
Parties
Applicant: D; Respondent: S; Mother: C; Minor: K
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Procedural Posture
Care Order Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
care order and placement order granted; mother's consent dispensed with; indirect contact only; no order for costs except public funding assessment
Legal Topics
Care Order, Placement Order, Adoption, Child Welfare, Parental Capacity
Family Law Care Order Placement Order Adoption Child Welfare Parental Capacity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D

Applicant

S

Respondent

C

Mother

K

Minor

Procedural Posture

Care Order Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether the mother has the necessary skills and capacity to care for K
  2. 2 whether K should be placed for adoption
  3. 3 whether the mother's consent to placement should be dispensed with

Ratio Decidendi

The evidence demonstrates the mother lacks the necessary skills and capacity to protect K and meet his needs; therefore, a care order and placement order are necessary in K's best interests, and the mother's consent is dispensed with.

Court Disposition

care order and placement order granted; mother's consent dispensed with; indirect contact only; no order for costs except public funding assessment

Orders

  • care order for K
  • placement order for K