DA v DJ

DA v DJ

The court found that there is reason to believe DJ lacks capacity based on credible, consistent evidence from witnesses and supporting material, satisfying the s.48 threshold. It is in DJ's best interests to make an interim order for psychiatric assessment without delay, adopting Judge Marshall's approach that a lower threshold applies for interim orders.

Parties
Applicant: DA; Respondent: DJ
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 November 2017
Procedural Posture
Court of Protection Application / Interim Declaration and Order
Outcome
Interim declaration and order granted
Legal Topics
Interim Orders, Capacity Assessment, Best Interests, Emergency Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DA

Applicant

DJ

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Court of Protection Application / Interim Declaration and Order

  1. 1 Whether the court has gateway jurisdiction under s.48 Mental Capacity Act 2005 to make interim orders regarding DJ's capacity
  2. 2 Whether there is reason to believe DJ lacks capacity to manage her affairs
  3. 3 Whether it is in DJ's best interests to make an interim order for psychiatric assessment

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there is reason to believe DJ lacks capacity based on credible, consistent evidence from witnesses and supporting material, satisfying the s.48 threshold. It is in DJ's best interests to make an interim order for psychiatric assessment without delay, adopting Judge Marshall's approach that a lower threshold applies for interim orders.

Court Disposition

Interim declaration and order granted

Orders

  • Official Solicitor to instruct independent psychiatrist and private GP to assess DJ's capacity and health
  • Directions for disclosure from borough and medical attendants