Gaston, R. v
The trial judge properly admitted the appellant's previous convictions for knife offences as bad character evidence relevant to propensity and identification, gave appropriate directions to the jury, and imposed a justified extended sentence based on the appellant's dangerousness and offending history.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Daeshaun Gaston; Co Defendant: Nathan Small; Co Defendant: Kyle Rose-Green
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Identification Evidence, Bad Character Evidence, Sentencing, Dangerousness, Extended Sentence, Propensity, Fairness of Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Daeshaun Gaston
Appellant
Nathan Small
Co Defendant
Kyle Rose-Green
Co Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in admitting previous convictions as bad character evidence
- 2 Whether the identification evidence was sufficient and properly summed up
- 3 Whether the extended sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or disparate
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge properly admitted the appellant's previous convictions for knife offences as bad character evidence relevant to propensity and identification, gave appropriate directions to the jury, and imposed a justified extended sentence based on the appellant's dangerousness and offending history.
Court Disposition
appeal against conviction and sentence dismissed
Orders
- conviction and sentence affirmed
- no further relief granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment