Bond, R v

Bond, R v

The notional determinate sentence of 5 years was manifestly excessive; the appropriate sentence was 2 years. As the notional minimum was less than 2 years, the statutory condition for imprisonment for public protection was not met. The sentence of imprisonment for public protection was quashed and substituted with a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment.

Parties
Respondent: R; Appellant: Dale Bond
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 May 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal allowed; sentence of imprisonment for public protection quashed and substituted with 2 years’ imprisonment; restraining order imposed.
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Threats to Kill, Imprisonment for Public Protection, Dangerousness Assessment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

R

Respondent

Dale Bond

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence of imprisonment for public protection was appropriate under s225 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
  2. 2 Whether the notional determinate sentence of 5 years was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The notional determinate sentence of 5 years was manifestly excessive; the appropriate sentence was 2 years. As the notional minimum was less than 2 years, the statutory condition for imprisonment for public protection was not met. The sentence of imprisonment for public protection was quashed and substituted with a sentence of 2 years’ imprisonment.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed; sentence of imprisonment for public protection quashed and substituted with 2 years’ imprisonment; restraining order imposed.

Orders

  • Sentence of imprisonment for public protection quashed
  • Substituted with 2 years’ imprisonment