R v Dale Thomason

R v Dale Thomason

The total sentence before reduction for guilty pleas was manifestly excessive and should have been nine years, not ten years and six months. The recorder erred in the calculation of reductions for guilty pleas and in the categorisation of the burglaries. The sentences on counts 1, 2, and 5 are quashed and...

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Dale Thomason
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 May 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal
Outcome
appeal allowed in part; sentences on counts 1, 2, and 5 quashed and substituted; total sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Burglary, Common Assault, Threatening With Offensive Weapon, Sentencing, Guilty Plea Credit, Totality Principle
Criminal Law Burglary Common Assault Threatening With Offensive Weapon Sentencing Guilty Plea Credit Totality Principle

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Dale Thomason

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Sentence Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the total sentence imposed was manifestly excessive under the totality principle
  2. 2 Whether sufficient credit was given for guilty pleas
  3. 3 Whether aggravating and mitigating factors were properly considered

Ratio Decidendi

The total sentence before reduction for guilty pleas was manifestly excessive and should have been nine years, not ten years and six months. The recorder erred in the calculation of reductions for guilty pleas and in the categorisation of the burglaries. The sentences on counts 1, 2, and 5 are quashed and substituted with lower sentences, resulting in a total sentence of six years and 292 days.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part; sentences on counts 1, 2, and 5 quashed and substituted; total sentence reduced

Orders

  • Sentence on count 1 substituted with two years and 146 days' imprisonment
  • Sentence on count 2 substituted with two years and 146 days' imprisonment, consecutive