Allfiled UK Ltd v Eltis & Ors
The court found Allfiled UK had a good arguable case that its intellectual property and confidential information were misused by the Respondents, breaching fiduciary and contractual duties. The evidence disclosed a serious issue to be tried, and damages would not be an adequate remedy. Injunctive relief was appropriate, subject to provisos to allow Port Tech to fulfil its contract with Magpie using material developed after 19 January 2015 and not derived from Allfiled UK’s property. The balance of convenience favoured granting injunctions with conditions to protect both parties and third parties.
- Parties
- Applicant/claimant: Allfiled UK Limited; Respondent: Dan Eltis; Respondent: Julian Saunders; Respondent: Stephen Bennett; Respondent: Ben Barker; Respondent: Ben Pearson; Respondent: David Gibbs; Respondent: Edward Brindley; Respondent: William Pearson-Denial; Respondent: Michael Peachey; Respondent: Conor Restall; Respondent: Israr Hussain; Respondent: Matthew Sibson; Respondent: Daniel Womersley; Respondent: Matthew Hersee; Respondent: Port Technologies Limited; Respondent: Port Technology Holdings Limited; Respondent: Little Grey and Gray Limited; Intervener: Magpie Investment Holdings Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 May 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief Pending Trial
- Outcome
- Interlocutory injunctions granted pending trial, subject to provisos and directions for expedited trial.
- Legal Topics
- Fiduciary Duties, Breach of Confidence, Restrictive Covenants, Interlocutory Injunctions, Conspiracy, Interference With Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Allfiled UK Limited
Applicant/claimant
Dan Eltis
Respondent
Julian Saunders
Respondent
Stephen Bennett
Respondent
Ben Barker
Respondent
Ben Pearson
Respondent
David Gibbs
Respondent
Edward Brindley
Respondent
William Pearson-Denial
Respondent
Michael Peachey
Respondent
Conor Restall
Respondent
Israr Hussain
Respondent
Matthew Sibson
Respondent
Daniel Womersley
Respondent
Matthew Hersee
Respondent
Port Technologies Limited
Respondent
Port Technology Holdings Limited
Respondent
Little Grey and Gray Limited
Respondent
Magpie Investment Holdings Limited
Intervener
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Injunctive Relief Pending Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Respondents breached fiduciary duties owed to Allfiled UK as directors
- 2 Whether the Respondents breached contractual and implied duties of fidelity and confidence
- 3 Whether the Respondents unlawfully used or disclosed Allfiled UK’s intellectual property and confidential information
Ratio Decidendi
The court found Allfiled UK had a good arguable case that its intellectual property and confidential information were misused by the Respondents, breaching fiduciary and contractual duties. The evidence disclosed a serious issue to be tried, and damages would not be an adequate remedy. Injunctive relief was appropriate, subject to provisos to allow Port Tech to fulfil its contract with Magpie using material developed after 19 January 2015 and not derived from Allfiled UK’s property. The balance of convenience favoured granting injunctions with conditions to protect both parties and third parties.
Court Disposition
Interlocutory injunctions granted pending trial, subject to provisos and directions for expedited trial.
Orders
- Respondents restrained from using, disclosing, or disseminating Allfiled UK’s intellectual property and confidential information developed before 19 January 2015.
- Respondents required to deliver up Allfiled UK’s property and information.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment