Red Bull Technology Ltd v Fallows [2021] EWHC 3502 (QB) (17 December 2021)

Red Bull Technology Ltd v Fallows [2021] EWHC 3502 (QB) (17 December 2021)

The application for specific disclosure was refused because the comparator evidence sought was not sufficiently relevant or necessary for the fair disposal of the issues, the defendant's pleaded case lacked specificity, and the disclosure would be disproportionate and unlikely to produce probative material. The central focus remains on the defendant's contract and circumstances.

Citation
[2021] EWHC 3502 (QB)
Parties
Claimant: Red Bull Technology Limited; Defendant: Dan Fallows
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
17 December 2021
Procedural Posture
Application for Specific Disclosure and Amendment of Particulars of Claim / Interlocutory Hearing
Outcome
Defendant's application for specific disclosure refused.
Legal Topics
Constructive Dismissal, Restraint of Trade, Disclosure, Minimum Term Employment Contracts
Employment Law Contract Law Constructive Dismissal Restraint of Trade Disclosure Minimum Term Employment Contracts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Red Bull Technology Limited

Claimant

Dan Fallows

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Application for Specific Disclosure and Amendment of Particulars of Claim / Interlocutory Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether specific disclosure regarding comparator employees is necessary and relevant to the issues of constructive dismissal and restraint of trade
  2. 2 Whether the minimum term in the defendant's contract is enforceable
  3. 3 Whether the claimant treated the defendant differently from other employees in similar circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The application for specific disclosure was refused because the comparator evidence sought was not sufficiently relevant or necessary for the fair disposal of the issues, the defendant's pleaded case lacked specificity, and the disclosure would be disproportionate and unlikely to produce probative material. The central focus remains on the defendant's contract and circumstances.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application for specific disclosure refused.

Orders

  • Application for specific disclosure dismissed.
  • Claimant's application to amend Particulars of Claim granted.