Amin, R. v
The covertly recorded conversations were properly admitted as evidence under section 114(1)(d) Criminal Justice Act 2003, given their reliability, corroboration, and probative value; the conviction is safe and the sentence is not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Dana Amin
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 September 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Perverting the Course of Justice, Preventing a Public Burial, Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Dana Amin
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether covertly recorded conversations implicating the appellant were properly admitted as evidence under section 114(1)(d) Criminal Justice Act 2003
- 2 Whether the conviction was safe given the inability to cross-examine the makers of the statements
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The covertly recorded conversations were properly admitted as evidence under section 114(1)(d) Criminal Justice Act 2003, given their reliability, corroboration, and probative value; the conviction is safe and the sentence is not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal sentence refused
Orders
- conviction upheld
- sentence of 8 years' imprisonment for perverting the course of justice and 5 years concurrent for preventing a public burial confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment