R v Daniel Barry Denison
The applicant is permitted to withdraw his applications; no order for costs is made due to his reliance on welfare benefits and inability to pay.
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Daniel Barry Denison
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
- Outcome
- Leave granted to withdraw applications; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Order, Costs, Withdrawal of Application
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Daniel Barry Denison
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Confiscation Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw applications for extension of time and leave to appeal against a confiscation order
- 2 Whether the applicant should be ordered to pay costs incurred by the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant is permitted to withdraw his applications; no order for costs is made due to his reliance on welfare benefits and inability to pay.
Court Disposition
Leave granted to withdraw applications; no order as to costs.
Orders
- Applicant permitted to withdraw applications for extension of time and leave to appeal.
- No order for costs against applicant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment