R v Daniel Baverstock
The total sentence of two years and three months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive having regard to the applicant's history, aggravating factors, and the totality principle.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Daniel Baverstock
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Restraining Order, Sentencing, Totality Principle, Impersonation of Police Officer, Use of Motor Vehicle Without Insurance
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Daniel Baverstock
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the total sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether sentences for breach of restraining order should have run concurrently rather than consecutively
- 3 Whether the totality principle required a reduction in the overall sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The total sentence of two years and three months' imprisonment was not manifestly excessive having regard to the applicant's history, aggravating factors, and the totality principle.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal sentence refused
Orders
- application refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment