Rushworth, R v

Rushworth, R v

The suspended sentence of 24 months was unduly lenient given the aggravating features, the offender's criminal history, and the sentencing guidelines. The correct approach was a starting point of five years, reduced by 10% for the guilty plea, resulting in a term of four years and five months, with time spent on remand counting towards the sentence.

Parties
Prosecutor: Regina; Defendant: Daniel Brian Rushworth
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 August 2018
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988
Outcome
sentence quashed and substituted
Legal Topics
Robbery, Sentencing, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Use of Weapon, Suspended Sentence
Criminal Law Robbery Sentencing Unduly Lenient Sentence Use of Weapon Suspended Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecutor

Daniel Brian Rushworth

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Reference by Attorney General Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the sentence imposed for robbery unduly lenient?
  2. 2 Did the sentencing court err in its approach to time spent on remand and the imposition of a suspended sentence?

Ratio Decidendi

The suspended sentence of 24 months was unduly lenient given the aggravating features, the offender's criminal history, and the sentencing guidelines. The correct approach was a starting point of five years, reduced by 10% for the guilty plea, resulting in a term of four years and five months, with time spent on remand counting towards the sentence.

Court Disposition

sentence quashed and substituted

Orders

  • The suspended sentence of 24 months is quashed.
  • A term of four years and five months imprisonment is substituted.