Burns v R. [2002] EWCA Crim 1324 (31st May 2002)
The appeal was dismissed because the British authorities did not collude in any impropriety by Venezuelan authorities, provided only factual information, and did not subvert the court's process. The absence of extradition proceedings did not automatically require the trial to be stayed; the court's discretion is fact-specific and was properly exercised in allowing the trial to proceed.
- Citation
- [2002] EWCA Crim 1324
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Burns; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Abuse of Process, Extradition, Deportation, Drug Importation, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Burns
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's trial was an abuse of process due to alleged misconduct by British and Venezuelan authorities in securing his return to the UK without extradition proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed because the British authorities did not collude in any impropriety by Venezuelan authorities, provided only factual information, and did not subvert the court's process. The absence of extradition proceedings did not automatically require the trial to be stayed; the court's discretion is fact-specific and was properly exercised in allowing the trial to proceed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against conviction dismissed.
- Application in relation to sentence adjourned pending medical evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment