Charlesworth, R (On the Application Of) v Crossrail Ltd
The assumption in rule 7 of the Crichel Down rules applies where compulsory purchase powers exist, unless the land was offered for sale before negotiations for acquisition. B55 did not offer the land for sale before negotiations with TfL, so the assumption applies. Both B55 and Mr Charlesworth had Qualifying Interests, and the policy was properly and fairly applied. The appeal is dismissed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Charlesworth; Respondent: Crossrail Limited; Interested Party: Berkeley Fifty-Five Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 03 July 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Crichel Down Rules, Qualifying Interest, Land Disposal Policy, Right of First Refusal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Charlesworth
Appellant
Crossrail Limited
Respondent
Berkeley Fifty-Five Limited
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From Administrative Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Berkeley Fifty-Five Limited had a Qualifying Interest under the Crichel Down rules and Policy C10 entitling Crossrail to sell the land on the open market rather than offering it back to Mr Charlesworth at market value.
Ratio Decidendi
The assumption in rule 7 of the Crichel Down rules applies where compulsory purchase powers exist, unless the land was offered for sale before negotiations for acquisition. B55 did not offer the land for sale before negotiations with TfL, so the assumption applies. Both B55 and Mr Charlesworth had Qualifying Interests, and the policy was properly and fairly applied. The appeal is dismissed.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment