Daniel Conway & Ors v Matthew Plass & Ors
Doing nothing with customer contracts does not incur liability as an expense of special administration; closing out and enforcing debts under customer contracts does not create administration expenses under Lundy Granite, as no benefit to the administration estate is objectively identified.
- Parties
- Applicant: Daniel Conway; Applicant: Tony Wright; Applicant: David Hudson; Respondent: Matthew Plass; Respondent: Alpha Development Europe Ltd; Respondent: Well-Safe Solutions Limited; Respondent: Czarnikow Group Limited; Respondent: Dawn Capital LLP; Respondent: Seasalt Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Special Administration Directions Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Directions sought under 1(a) and 1(b) answered in the negative; neither action incurs liability as an administration expense.
- Legal Topics
- Administration Expenses, Lundy Granite Principle, Contract Termination, Close Out Provisions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Conway
Applicant
Tony Wright
Applicant
David Hudson
Applicant
Matthew Plass
Respondent
Alpha Development Europe Ltd
Respondent
Well-Safe Solutions Limited
Respondent
Czarnikow Group Limited
Respondent
Dawn Capital LLP
Respondent
Seasalt Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Special Administration Directions Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether doing nothing with customer contracts incurs liability as an expense of special administration
- 2 Whether closing out and enforcing debts under customer contracts incurs liability as an expense of special administration
Ratio Decidendi
Doing nothing with customer contracts does not incur liability as an expense of special administration; closing out and enforcing debts under customer contracts does not create administration expenses under Lundy Granite, as no benefit to the administration estate is objectively identified.
Court Disposition
Directions sought under 1(a) and 1(b) answered in the negative; neither action incurs liability as an administration expense.
Orders
- Joint Special Administrators will not incur liability as an expense of special administration by doing nothing with customer contracts.
- Joint Special Administrators will not incur liability as an expense of special administration by closing out and enforcing debts under customer contracts.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment