Daniel Gough v Powys County Council
Given the appellant's conviction for a violent offence, previous criminal history, and the need to protect the public and maintain confidence in the regulatory regime, an unlimited prohibition order is necessary and proportionate. The statutory scheme does not require time-limiting such orders, but allows for future...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Daniel Gough; Respondent: Powys County Council
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Prohibition Orders, Fitness to Practice, Violence Convictions, Rehabilitation of Offenders, Public Protection, Regulatory Discretion
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Daniel Gough
Appellant
Powys County Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is unfit to carry on estate agency work under section 3 of the Estate Agents Act 1979
- 2 Whether a prohibition order should be imposed and if so, whether it should be unlimited or restricted
Ratio Decidendi
Given the appellant's conviction for a violent offence, previous criminal history, and the need to protect the public and maintain confidence in the regulatory regime, an unlimited prohibition order is necessary and proportionate. The statutory scheme does not require time-limiting such orders, but allows for future review or revocation.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The prohibition order against Daniel Gough dated 27 August 2024 is upheld without limitation.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment